Iconoclastia 2009
In former times buildings and other constructions that formalised singular moments for the community were called MONUMENTS. Expressions of power, celebrations of rituals and collective affirmations constituted their basis. Usually they were solid. They gathered the world around them; they used to ESTABLISH RELATIONS with their surroundings...
Definitely TERRESTRIAL, a monument was like a rock - a mountain that erected dominated the plane. In the contemporary world, any architectural project with exceptional expressive will is commonly called an ICON. Etymologically, an icon is the REPRESENTATION of divinity throughout painting with a strong coded style. They were regarded as the presence of God and the Saints on earth. But the tradition of Icons has its antagonist incorporated. The ICONOCLASTIC MOVEMENT destroyed all the representation of divinity pleading that it destroys its very essence.

 

Contributors
Yannis Aesopos
Pier Vittorio Aureli
Isabel Concheiro
Sabine von Fischer
Naoto Fukosawa
Hans Ibelings
Krunoslav Ivanisin
Alicia Guerrero Yeste
Freddy Massad
Daniel Kiss
Josep Lluis Mateo
Jasper Morrison
Agusti Obiol

Florian Sauter
Peter Sloterdijk
Elias Torres Tur
Yoshiharu Tsukamoto








  Architectural Papers IV
Iconoclastia
150 pages / published by Actar
edited by Florian Sauter
       
         
   

Global Housing Projects 2008
One could consider the project as historic criticism with the buildings as protagonists. The project is considered being a contribution in a wider context. Housing typologies are chosen because of the more evident parameters, which have been established until today. The main goal is to define contemporary architectural cannons of the past 25 years in one specific architectural field that is housing and at the same time give a perspective about the new important guidelines in domestic architecture.
The selection of influential housing projects of the last 25 years reflects the most innovative housing projects that have been built, seizing common notions and new demands. The slection of the contemporary practice should help explain and restructure our recent past as immediate base for our present

 

Contributors
Charles Correa
Paulo Mendes da Rocha
Jean Nouvel
Alvar Siza
Rem Koolhaas
Riegler Riewe
Hans Kollhoff
Kazuyo Sejima
MVRDV
Josep Lluis Mateo
Diener & Diener
Herzog & De Meuron
Eduardo Souto De Moura
Rafael Iglesia
Riken Yamamoto


Kazuhiro Kojima
Stanley Saitowitz
Christian Kerez
Arangurengallegos
Derek Dellekamp
Lacaton Vassal
Plot = BIG+JDS
Chiba Manabu
Ofis Arhitekti
Cino Zucchi
Dietmar Eberle
Dominique Boudet
Miquel Adria
Erwin Viray
Ramias Steinemann

           
 

 


   
Natural Metaphor 2007
No interpretation of the idea of nature is good for all people in all places at all times. Charles Darwin’s century brought home forcefully the reality of time, of evolutionary process that ultimately transforms all things. Darwin’s contemporary T.H. Huxley believed that evolution forced the question of our place in nature upon us. Twentieth-century science posed a further interpretative challenge. We have reached the end of credible claims to certainty concerning nature. Given uncertainty, open-ended inquiry becomes a hallmark of rationality, and the idea of nature remains inevitably in flux.
Contributors
Philip Ursprung
Erwin Viray
Christophe Girot
Toni Girones
Frederic Schwartz
Patrick Gartmann
Catherine Dumont D’Ayot
Christian Kerez
Olafur Eliasson
Peter St. John
Stan Allen
Ramias Steinemann

Paulo Mendes Da Rocha
Marcel Meili
Inaki Abalos
Josep Lluis Mateo
Florian Sauter
Manuel Castels
Alice Hucker
Mai Komuro
Michal Krzywdziak
Jonathan Lin
Maria Viné
Renzo Piano
           
 

Architectural Papers III
Natural Metaphor
175 pages / published by Actar
edited by Florian Sauter

 

 


 

Bigscale Grossform 2006
According to natural scientific logics, the size of creatures in nature is strictly linked to their form. A fly for example possesses a form that can absolutely not be increased. Should this still occur, the hence emerging monster would collapse, because his supporting elements, although proportionally increased, would not be capable of carrying the overweight.
If we consider architecture as a phenomenon that follows the laws of the physical world, size and scale appear as initial conditions, under which architecture has to be pondered. This volume of Architectural Papers gathers aseries of data, arguments and projects produced at our chair surrounding this theme.

  Contributors
David Adjaye
Johan Arnys
Eduardo Arroyo
Zygmunt Baumann
Ivo Bertolo
Ferran Grau
Josep Lluis Mateo
Marcel Meili
Tivadar Puskas
Qingyun Ma


Hani Rashid
Ramias Steinemann
Philip Ursprung
Maria Vine
Elia Zenghelis

           
 

Architectural Papers II
Bigscale Grossform
192 pages / published by GG
edited by Ramias Steinemann

 
           
    Object Laboratory 2004
This publication intends to periodically transmit the pedagogical experience gained at our chair of the ETH of Zurich, Switzerland. To teach project design always entails a personal encounter between teacher and student acting on things one does not know with results that are not always conveniently judged among themselves, but as steps of a cognitive process open to the future; although it may also be convenient to evaluate pedagogical experience as a more general sphere, where questions, answers and ways of acting can be focused before the backdrop of a more global context.
 

Contributors
Ivo Bertolo
Sabine V.Fischer
Gustavo Gili Galfetti
Yung Ho Chang
Diedrich Diederichsen
Piet Eckert
Christopphe Girot
Ernst Hubeli
Bernhard Khoury




Josep Lluis Mateo
Maria Viné

           
 

Architectural Papers I
Object Laboratory
174 pages / published by GG
edited by Maria Vine