| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Iconoclastia
2009
In former times buildings and other constructions that formalised singular moments for the community were called MONUMENTS. Expressions of power, celebrations of rituals and collective affirmations constituted their basis. Usually they were solid. They gathered the world around them; they used to ESTABLISH RELATIONS with their surroundings...
Definitely TERRESTRIAL, a monument was like a rock - a mountain that erected dominated the plane. In the contemporary world, any architectural project with exceptional expressive will is commonly called an ICON. Etymologically, an icon is the REPRESENTATION of divinity throughout painting with a strong coded style. They were regarded as the presence of God and the Saints on earth. But the tradition of Icons has its antagonist incorporated. The ICONOCLASTIC MOVEMENT destroyed all the representation of divinity pleading that it destroys its very essence.
|
|
Contributors
Yannis Aesopos
Pier Vittorio Aureli
Isabel Concheiro
Sabine von Fischer
Naoto Fukosawa
Hans Ibelings
Krunoslav Ivanisin
Alicia Guerrero Yeste
Freddy Massad
Daniel Kiss
Josep Lluis Mateo
Jasper Morrison
Agusti Obiol |
Florian Sauter
Peter Sloterdijk
Elias Torres Tur
Yoshiharu Tsukamoto
|
| |
Architectural Papers IV
Iconoclastia
150 pages / published by Actar
edited by Florian Sauter |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Global Housing Projects
2008
One could consider the project as historic criticism with the buildings
as protagonists. The project is considered being a contribution in a wider
context. Housing typologies are chosen because of the more evident parameters,
which have been established until today. The main goal is to define contemporary
architectural cannons of the past 25 years in one specific architectural
field that is housing and at the same time give a perspective about the
new important guidelines in domestic architecture.
The selection of influential housing projects of the last 25 years reflects
the most innovative housing projects that have been built, seizing common
notions and new demands. The slection of the contemporary practice should
help explain and restructure our recent past as immediate base for our present
|
|
Contributors
Charles Correa
Paulo Mendes da Rocha
Jean Nouvel
Alvar Siza
Rem Koolhaas
Riegler Riewe
Hans Kollhoff
Kazuyo Sejima
MVRDV
Josep Lluis Mateo
Diener & Diener
Herzog & De Meuron
Eduardo Souto De Moura
Rafael Iglesia
Riken Yamamoto
|
Kazuhiro Kojima
Stanley Saitowitz
Christian Kerez
Arangurengallegos
Derek Dellekamp
Lacaton Vassal
Plot = BIG+JDS
Chiba Manabu
Ofis Arhitekti
Cino Zucchi
Dietmar Eberle
Dominique Boudet
Miquel Adria
Erwin Viray
Ramias Steinemann
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Architectural Papers Monograph
25 Global Housing Projects
300 pages / published by Actar
edited by Ramias Steinemann
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Natural Metaphor 2007
No interpretation of the idea of nature is good for all people
in all places at all times. Charles Darwin’s century brought home
forcefully the reality of time, of evolutionary process that ultimately
transforms all things. Darwin’s contemporary T.H. Huxley believed
that evolution forced the question of our place in nature upon us. Twentieth-century
science posed a further interpretative challenge. We have reached the
end of credible claims to certainty concerning nature. Given uncertainty,
open-ended inquiry becomes a hallmark of rationality, and the idea of
nature remains inevitably in flux. |
|
Contributors
Philip Ursprung
Erwin Viray
Christophe Girot
Toni Girones
Frederic Schwartz
Patrick Gartmann
Catherine Dumont D’Ayot
Christian Kerez
Olafur Eliasson
Peter St. John
Stan Allen
Ramias Steinemann
|
Paulo Mendes Da Rocha
Marcel Meili
Inaki Abalos
Josep Lluis Mateo
Florian Sauter
Manuel Castels
Alice Hucker
Mai Komuro
Michal Krzywdziak
Jonathan Lin
Maria Viné
Renzo Piano
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Architectural Papers III
Natural Metaphor
175 pages / published by Actar
edited by Florian Sauter
|
|
|
| |

|
|
Bigscale
Grossform 2006
According to natural scientific logics, the size of creatures in nature
is strictly linked to their form. A fly for example possesses a form that
can absolutely not be increased. Should this still occur, the hence emerging
monster would collapse, because his supporting elements, although proportionally
increased, would not be capable of carrying the overweight.
If we consider architecture as a phenomenon that follows the laws of the
physical world, size and scale appear as initial conditions, under which
architecture has to be pondered. This volume of Architectural Papers gathers
aseries of data, arguments and projects produced at our chair surrounding
this theme.
|
|
Contributors
David Adjaye
Johan Arnys
Eduardo Arroyo
Zygmunt Baumann
Ivo Bertolo
Ferran Grau
Josep Lluis Mateo
Marcel Meili
Tivadar Puskas
Qingyun Ma
|
Hani Rashid
Ramias Steinemann
Philip Ursprung
Maria Vine
Elia Zenghelis
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Architectural
Papers II
Bigscale Grossform
192 pages / published by GG
edited by Ramias Steinemann
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
Object Laboratory 2004
This publication intends to periodically transmit the
pedagogical experience gained at our chair of the ETH of Zurich, Switzerland.
To teach project design always entails a personal encounter between teacher
and student acting on things one does not know with results that are not
always conveniently judged among themselves, but as steps of a cognitive
process open to the future; although it may also be convenient to evaluate
pedagogical experience as a more general sphere, where questions, answers
and ways of acting can be focused before the backdrop of a more global
context. |
|
Contributors
Ivo Bertolo
Sabine V.Fischer
Gustavo Gili Galfetti
Yung Ho Chang
Diedrich Diederichsen
Piet Eckert
Christopphe Girot
Ernst Hubeli
Bernhard Khoury
|
Josep Lluis Mateo
Maria Viné
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Architectural
Papers I
Object Laboratory
174 pages / published by GG
edited by Maria Vine |
|